Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 30(6): 397-406, dic. 2017. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-169392

RESUMEN

Given the growing incidence of invasive candidiasis in critically ill and haemato-oncological patients and its poor outcomes, an early diagnosis and treatment are need for get a better prognosis. This document reviews the current approaches that help in diagnosis of invasive candidiasis based on culture-independent microbiological tests. The combination of clinical prediction scores with fungal serological markers could facilitate the approach in antifungal therapy, optimizing it. This article also reviews the epidemiology and primary risk factors for invasive candidiasis in these patients, updating the therapeutic approach algorithms in both clinical contexts based on the main evidence and international guidelines (AU)


Dada la creciente incidencia de candidiasis invasiva en pacientes críticos y hematooncológicos y sus malos resultados, es necesario un diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz para obtener un mejor pronóstico. Este documento revisa los enfoques actuales que ayudan en el diagnóstico de candidiasis invasiva basado en pruebas microbiológicas independientes del cultivo. La combinación de puntuaciones de predicción clínica con marcadores serológicos fúngicos podría facilitar el enfoque en la terapia antifúngica, optimizándola. Este artículo también revisa la epidemiología y los principales factores de riesgo de candidiasis invasiva en estos pacientes, actualizando los algoritmos de abordaje terapéutico en ambos contextos clínicos basados en la evidencia publicada y en las guías internacionales (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Candidiasis Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Candida/patogenicidad , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Algoritmos , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Candidiasis Invasiva/microbiología
2.
Gastroenterology ; 145(1): 121-128.e1, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23562754

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Strategies to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection could be improved by suppressing acid and extending the duration of therapy (optimization). We compared the efficacy of 2 different optimized nonbismuth quadruple regimens in areas of high resistance to antimicrobial agents. METHODS: We performed a prospective noninferiority multicenter trial in which 343 consecutive individuals with H pylori infection were assigned randomly to groups given hybrid therapy (40 mg omeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin, twice daily for 14 days; 500 mg clarithromycin and 500 mg nitroimidazole were added, twice daily for the final 7 days) or concomitant therapy (same 4 drugs taken concurrently, twice daily for 14 days). We assessed bacterial resistance to these drugs in a subset of patients using the E-test. Efficacy, side effects, and compliance were determined. RESULTS: In per-protocol analysis, rates of eradication for hybrid and concomitant therapies were 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87%-95%) and 96.1% (95% CI, 93%-99%), respectively (P = .07). In intention-to-treat analysis, rates were 90% (95% CI, 86%-93%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 87%-95%), respectively (P = .35). Almost all patients (95.5%) were fully compliant; 23.5% of patients had H pylori strains that were resistant to clarithromycin (Italy, 26%; Spain, 19.5%), 33% were resistant to metronidazole (Italy, 33%; Spain, 34%), and 8.8% were resistant to both drugs (Italy, 7.1%; Spain, 11.5%). Side effects (only mild) were reported in 51.5% of patients (47% hybrid vs 56% concomitant; P = .06). Compliance greater than 80% was the only significant predictor of eradication (odds ratio, 12.5; 95% CI, 3.1-52; P = .001). Significantly more patients were compliant with hybrid therapy (98.8%) than concomitant therapy (95.2%; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Optimized nonbismuth quadruple hybrid and concomitant therapies cured more than 90% of patients with H pylori infections in areas of high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01464060.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Levofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Helicobacter ; 17(4): 269-76, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22759326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Using quadruple clarithromycin-containing regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication is controversial with high rates of macrolide resistance. AIM: To evaluate antibiotic resistance rates and the efficacy of empirical and tailored nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy in a setting with cure rates <80% for triple and sequential therapies. METHODS: 209 consecutive naive H. pylori-positive patients without susceptibility testing were empirically treated with 10-day concomitant therapy (proton pump inhibitors (PPI), amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg; all drugs b.i.d.). Simultaneously, 89 patients with positive H. pylori culture were randomized to receive triple versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori, and sequential versus concomitant therapy for clarithromycin-resistant strains. Eradication was confirmed with ¹³C-urea breath test or histology 8 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat eradication rates after empirical concomitant therapy without susceptibility testing were 89% (95%CI:84-93%) and 87% (83-92%). Antibiotic resistance rates were: clarithromycin, 20%; metronidazole, 34%; and both clarithromycin and metronidazole, 10%. Regarding clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori, concomitant therapy was significantly better than triple therapy by per protocol [92% (82-100%) vs 74% (58-91%), p = 0.05] and by intention to treat [92% (82-100%) vs 70% (57-90%), p = 0.02]. As for antibiotic-resistant strains, eradication rates for concomitant and sequential therapies were 100% (5/5) vs 75% (3/4), for clarithromycin-resistant/metronidazole-susceptible strains and 75% (3/4) vs 60% (3/5) for dual-resistant strains. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical 10-day concomitant therapy achieves good eradication rates, close to 90%, in settings with multiresistant H. pylori strains. Tailored concomitant therapy is significantly superior to triple therapy for clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori and at least as effective as sequential therapy for resistant strains.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...